On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 04:15:25PM -0700, Lisa Nguyen wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> > Your patch is great, but actually, are any of the functions in this >> > header used? `grep cfs_bitmap drivers/staging/lustre/ -Rl` only shows >> > this header file. >> > >> > Perhaps we can delete the whole thing? >> > >> > regards, >> > dan carpenter >> >> Ah, good point. I didn't think about that. I ran your grep command and >> got the same results. >> >> Since that is the case, is there a specific protocol I have to follow >> and suggest for this particular header file to be deleted? It's my >> first time running into this situation. > > Just email saying, "Ignore this patch, please replace it with this newer > one", or just do a "v4" that does this as well. > > thanks, > > greg k-h
Greg, please ignore this patch as I have submitted a new one to be applied. The new patch title should say, "Remove bitmap.h file". Dan, thank you for your suggestion. --Lisa _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
