On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:10:52PM -0500, Mauro Dreissig wrote:
> As pointed out by sparse:
> 
> drivers/staging/media/as102/as102_fw.c:29:6: warning: symbol 'as102_st_fw1' 
> was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/media/as102/as102_fw.c:30:6: warning: symbol 'as102_st_fw2' 
> was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/media/as102/as102_fw.c:31:6: warning: symbol 'as102_dt_fw1' 
> was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/media/as102/as102_fw.c:32:6: warning: symbol 'as102_dt_fw2' 
> was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/media/as102/as102_usb_drv.c:194:25: warning: symbol 
> 'as102_priv_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Also use the const qualifier on the firmware name strings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Dreissig <muk...@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to