On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:46:42PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote: > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > <snip> > > > And finally, is this all really needed? Why not just fix the structures > > to be "correct", and then fix userspace to use the correct structures as > > well, thereby not needing a compat layer at all? > > Some of the binder ioctls take userspace pointers. Are you suggesting > storing those pointers in a __u64 to avoid having to have a > compat_ioctl?
Yes, that's the best way to solve the issue, right? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
