On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:23:29PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:24:14PM +0800, ZHAO Gang wrote: > > As TODO file suggested, drop packet instead of return NETDEV_TX_BUSY > > when tx failed. > > Really? That's ok to do? Seems like you are changing the logic of the > function a lot here, how does the code let userspace know packets were > dropped then?
The TODO file item was a suggestion by David Miller from the last review - http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/28/756 Mark _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
