On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 01:06:52PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 25/02/14 16:23, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > > +Freescale i.MX DRM master device > > +================================ > > + > > +The freescale i.MX DRM master device is a virtual device needed to list all > > +IPU or other display interface nodes that comprise the graphics subsystem. > > + > > +Required properties: > > +- compatible: Should be "fsl,imx-drm" > > +- ports: Should contain a list of phandles pointing to display interface > > ports > > + of IPU devices > > + > > +example: > > + > > +imx-drm { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx-drm"; > > + ports = <&ipu_di0>; > > +}; > > I'm not a fan of having non-hardware related things in the DT data. > Especially if it makes direct references to our SW, in this case DRM. > There's no DRM on the board. I wanted to avoid all that with OMAP > display bindings. > > Is there even need for such a master device? You can find all the > connected display devices from any single display device, by just > following the endpoint links.
Please read up on what has been discussed over previous years: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-July/041159.html and please, let's not endlessly rehash old discussions because someone wasn't involved and has a different opinion, otherwise we're never going to get anywhere. Thanks. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly improving, and getting towards what was expected from it. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel