On 02/26/2014 10:30 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:18:26AM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
>> This patch addresses the follow error message followed
>> by a kernel oops:
>>
>> dgap: driver does not set tty->port. This will crash the kernel later. Fix
>> the driver
>>
>> It also renames the main function this patch addresses because
>> its name is misleading.
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
I'm in the process of running dgap.c through checkpatch and creating another
patch set. Before I get too far into it I wanted to get clarification on a
couple of things.
1. Should I wait until I know the status of my last patch before I post new
ones?
2. There are MANY "over 80 char lines" warnings. I'm uncertain of the
acceptable way to fix some of them. Here is an example of one:
while (tail != head) {
if (reason & IFTLW) {
if (ch->ch_tun.un_flags & UN_LOW) {
ch->ch_tun.un_flags &= ~UN_LOW;
// everything in this block is over 80 chars
if (ch->ch_tun.un_flags & UN_ISOPEN) {
if ((ch->ch_tun.un_tty->flags &
(1 << TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP)) &&
ch->ch_tun.un_tty->ldisc->ops->write_wakeup) { // ????
DGAP_UNLOCK(ch->ch_lock,
lock_flags2);
DGAP_UNLOCK(bd->bd_lock,
lock_flags);
(ch->ch_tun.un_tty->ldisc->ops->write_wakeup)(ch->ch_tun.un_tty); // ????
DGAP_LOCK(bd->bd_lock,
lock_flags);
DGAP_LOCK(ch->ch_lock,
lock_flags2);
}
wake_up_interruptible(&ch->ch_tun.un_tty->write_wait);
wake_up_interruptible(&ch->ch_tun.un_flags_wait);
// end of nasty block
}
}
I figured I'd leave them for the last patch but there are a few that if I wait
will show up in
one or more of the patches preceding that last one. This one is actually one of
them. While
fixing up bracket errors with "chechpatch -file", chechpatch doesn't like the
patch created.
Thanks
Mark
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
