On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:54:23PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 02:52:34PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > How can dmfc ever be NULL? You control what values you pass to it, why > > check it again? > > Indeed. This is actually a case where the static checker warning is > ambiguous. What's triggered it is the dmfc test for NULL after it's > been used. It doesn't necessarily mean that the test should be moved > earlier. >
Btw, this is another case where Smatch wouldn't have generated a warning if I had had the cross function database set up. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
