On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 09:22:36AM -0400, Mark Hounschell wrote: > checkpatch now gives 0 warnings or errors on both dgap.c and dgap.h > so I'm now looking at sparse errors/warnings. There are many and I'm > not really clear as to the best way to address them. This is my first > exposure to sparse. A quick internet search reveals that using "__iomem" > in some way is the proper fix for most of what I see?
Looks fine. You understand the point, right? __iomem is hardware addresses. Kernel memory, hardware memory and user memory are mapped in different places. You can't dereference an iomem pointer or even a user pointer. They have special functions so you can write to them. A common source of bugs is forgetting which is which. The sparse annotations are compiled out while __CHECKER__ isn't defined. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
