On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:06:24PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > From: Andev [mailto:debian...@gmail.com]
> > Your use of goto exit/cleanup in some functions and returning directly on
> > errors in others could use a cleanup. Please consider doing that while you
> > are
> > touching those files.
>
> Will do. The most recent changes I made to netvsc.c, I think was
> consistent with the existing code; going forward we will certainly
> move towards a more consistent coding style.
It scares me when you talk about being consistent with the existing
code... Just do it the correct way.
1) Don't do the "return ret;" if you know ret is zero.
2) Replace:
ret = vmbus_sendpacket(...);
return ret;
with
return vmbus_sendpacket(...);
3) Don't do "goto cleanup;" when "return ret;" will suffice. The
do-nothing goto is misleading because you assume it will cleanup
somthing. Some people used to misread CodingStyle to think that all
functions should only have one return but I have updated it so it is
more clear.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
