On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:38:37AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 07:10:37PM +0200, Fernando Apesteguia wrote:
> > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:57:48AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 06:40:13PM +0200, Fernando Apesteguia wrote:
> > > > Small fix to driver. If these patches are welcomed, more could come in 
> > > > the
> > > > future.
> > > > 
> > > > Regards
> > > 
> > > > >From d8369cba0552c5ea5f4eadc750434e39785e042a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Fernando Apesteguia <fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 18:16:53 +0200
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] [staging/silicom] Fixing missing blank line after
> > > >  declarations
> > > > 
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c |    1 +
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > They would be welcome if they were in a format I could apply them in :)
> > > 
> > > See Documentation/SubmittingPatches for the details on how to do this
> > > properly.
> > 
> > I think this one is good.
> 
> What one?  This email, no, I can't take it.
> 
> The patch needs to be in a format that I do not need to edit by hand,
> and you forgot the signed-off-by: line, which is described in the kernel
> file I pointed you at.  Please read that file for what it means, and how
> to properly format a patch for inclusion.

From: Fernando Apesteguia <fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com>

Fix style bug by removing blank line at the beginning of the function and
adding an empty line after variable declarations

Signed-off-by: Fernando Apesteguia <fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com>
---
--- drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c.orig    2014-05-05 18:58:49.654207305 
+0200
+++ drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c 2014-05-05 18:59:10.394206591 +0200
@@ -7448,8 +7448,8 @@ static int bypass_proc_create_dev_sd(str

 static int bypass_proc_remove_dev_sd(struct bpctl_dev *pbp_device_block)
 {
-
        struct bypass_pfs_sd *current_pfs = &pbp_device_block->bypass_pfs_set;
+
        remove_proc_subtree(current_pfs->dir_name, bp_procfs_dir);
        current_pfs->bypass_entry = NULL;
        return 0;

>


> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to