On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 07:24:51PM +0100, Alex Dewar wrote: > + > + ret = atomisp_register_i2c_module(&flash->sd, NULL, LED_FLASH); > + if (!ret) > + return 0;
Ugh!!! This is a a special case of the "success handling instead of failure handling" anti-pattern where the last condition in the function is different. I just fixed a bug caused by this on Wed. https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg680226.html But it doesn't cause any problems here so whatever... Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
