From: Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com>
Reviewing sram_write_dma_safe(), there are two
identical calls to virt_addr_valid(). The second
call can be simplified by a comparison of variables
set from the first call.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com>
---
drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
index 22d3b684f04f..c99adb0c99f1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int sram_write_dma_safe(struct wfx_dev *wdev, u32
addr, const u8 *buf,
tmp = buf;
}
ret = sram_buf_write(wdev, addr, tmp, len);
- if (!virt_addr_valid(buf))
+ if (tmp != buf)
kfree(tmp);
return ret;
}
--
2.18.1
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
