Ah, shoot - good spot, thanks
On 18/09/2020 09:03, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I ran Smatch over the code and it spotted an off by one.
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:36:18PM +0100, Daniel Scally wrote:
>> +#define MAX_CONNECTED_DEVICES 4
>> +#define SWNODE_SENSOR_HID 0
>> +#define SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT 1
>> +#define SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT 2
>> +#define SWNODE_CIO2_PORT 3
>> +#define SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT 4
>> +#define SWNODE_NULL_TERMINATOR 5
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>> +struct sensor {
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct software_node swnodes[5];
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> This needs to be 6 instead of 5 to prevent memory corruption.
>
>> + struct property_entry sensor_props[6];
>> + struct property_entry cio2_props[3];
>> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
>> +};
>
>> + nodes[SWNODE_NULL_TERMINATOR] = SOFTWARE_NODE_NULL;
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Here.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
