On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 07:39:58PM -0400, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 2:34 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > + return snprintf(buf, max_size, "%pM\n", response.addr); > > Judging from a few Outreachy patches that have hit my inbox, snprintf() is > considered unsafe in a sysfs_get callback. It should be replaced by > scnprintf() or even better, sysfs_emit(), which was recently introduced > to address sprintf-variant issues in sysfs callbacks.
It's already applied, I think you can send a follow up for above, which is good point, but not the scope of the patch (although they might have been unified together). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
