On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 03:28:29PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Since the CSI controller binding is getting a bit more complex due
> to the addition of MIPI CSI-2 bridge support, make the ports node
> explicit with the parallel port.
>
> This way, it's clear that the controller only supports parallel
> interface input and there's no confusion about the port number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkow...@bootlin.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi
> index 9be13378d4df..02b698cace6a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi
> @@ -803,6 +803,15 @@ csi: camera@1cb0000 {
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&csi_pins>;
> status = "disabled";
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + csi_in_parallel: port@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + };
> + };
> };This will create a DTC warning, since port@0 is the only node, and is equivalent to port Maxime
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
