On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 09:25:28PM +0800, Zheng Yongjun wrote:
> mutex lock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_MUTEX()
> rather than explicitly calling mutex_init().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongj...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  .../vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c        | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git 
> a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c 
> b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c
> index 79b75efa6868..864253866155 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c
> @@ -12,13 +12,12 @@ static   int                        g_connected;
>  static   int                        g_num_deferred_callbacks;
>  static   VCHIQ_CONNECTED_CALLBACK_T g_deferred_callback[MAX_CALLBACKS];
>  static   int                        g_once_init;
> -static   struct mutex               g_connected_mutex;
> +static   DEFINE_MUTEX(g_connected_mutex);
>  
>  /* Function to initialize our lock */
>  static void connected_init(void)
>  {
>       if (!g_once_init) {
> -             mutex_init(&g_connected_mutex);
>               g_once_init = 1;
>       }

Delete the extra curly braces.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to