On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:40:41AM +0530, karthik alapati wrote:
> fix some checkpatch "Block comments use * on subsequent lines"
> warnings and remove obsolete code
> 

This isn't the correct commit message.  It should say something like:
"There is a bunch of messy, commented out code.  Just delete it."


> Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: karthik alapati <m...@karthek.com>
> ---
>  .../staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c   | 44 ++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c 
> b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c
> index 1fd504181..3d22bd304 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c
> @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ u32 PHY_QueryBBReg_8723B(struct adapter *Adapter, u32 
> RegAddr, u32 BitMask)
>       return 0;
>  #endif
>  
> -     /* RT_TRACE(COMP_RF, DBG_TRACE, ("--->PHY_QueryBBReg(): RegAddr(%#lx), 
> BitMask(%#lx)\n", RegAddr, BitMask)); */
> -
>       OriginalValue = rtw_read32(Adapter, RegAddr);
>       BitShift = phy_CalculateBitShift(BitMask);
>  
> @@ -94,8 +92,6 @@ void PHY_SetBBReg_8723B(
>       return;
>  #endif
>  
> -     /* RT_TRACE(COMP_RF, DBG_TRACE, ("--->PHY_SetBBReg(): RegAddr(%#lx), 
> BitMask(%#lx), Data(%#lx)\n", RegAddr, BitMask, Data)); */
> -
>       if (BitMask != bMaskDWord) { /* if not "double word" write */
>               OriginalValue = rtw_read32(Adapter, RegAddr);
>               BitShift = phy_CalculateBitShift(BitMask);
> @@ -159,13 +155,9 @@ static u32 phy_RFSerialRead_8723B(
>       if (RfPiEnable) {
>               /*  Read from BBreg8b8, 12 bits for 8190, 20bits for T65 RF */
>               retValue = PHY_QueryBBReg(Adapter, 
> pPhyReg->rfLSSIReadBackPi|MaskforPhySet, bLSSIReadBackData);
> -
> -             /* RT_DISP(FINIT, INIT_RF, ("Readback from RF-PI : 0x%x\n", 
> retValue)); */
>       } else {
>               /* Read from BBreg8a0, 12 bits for 8190, 20 bits for T65 RF */
>               retValue = PHY_QueryBBReg(Adapter, 
> pPhyReg->rfLSSIReadBack|MaskforPhySet, bLSSIReadBackData);
> -
> -             /* RT_DISP(FINIT, INIT_RF, ("Readback from RF-SI : 0x%x\n", 
> retValue)); */
>       }
>       return retValue;
>  
> @@ -230,15 +222,13 @@ static void phy_RFSerialWrite_8723B(
>       /*  */
>       /*  Put write addr in [5:0]  and write data in [31:16] */
>       /*  */
> -     /* DataAndAddr = (Data<<16) | (NewOffset&0x3f); */
> -     DataAndAddr = ((NewOffset<<20) | (Data&0x000fffff)) & 0x0fffffff;       
> /*  T65 RF */
> +     DataAndAddr = ((NewOffset<<20) | (Data&0x000fffff)) & 0x0fffffff;
> +     /*  T65 RF */

The patch is supposed to be deleting code so we don't want any + lines
which change code.  Only deletes.  Also don't put the coment after the
the code which it's commenting on.

> @@ -761,20 +745,20 @@ static void phy_PostSetBwMode8723B(struct adapter 
> *Adapter)
>  
>               PHY_SetBBReg(Adapter, rFPGA1_RFMOD, bRFMOD, 0x1);
>  
> -             /*  Set Control channel to upper or lower. These settings are 
> required only for 40MHz */
> +             /**
> +              * Set Control channel to upper or lower. These settings are 
> required only
> +              * for 40MHz
> +              */

Yeah.  Get rid of these plus lines and resend.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to