This change does not fix a checkpatch issue but it is more consistent
with the rest of the union.

Signed-off-by: William Durand <will+...@drnd.me>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BA.h     | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BA.h 
b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BA.h
index af25b4850975..1a8ca249ed23 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BA.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BA.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ union ba_param_set {
        u8 char_data[2];
        u16 short_data;
        struct {
-               u16 AMSDU_Support:1;
+               u16 amsdu_support:1;
                u16 ba_policy:1;
                u16 TID:4;
                u16 buffer_size:10;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c 
b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c
index 17520fcbc1bb..002ec9a7a8c0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ void TsInitAddBA(struct rtllib_device *ieee, struct 
tx_ts_record *pTS,
        DeActivateBAEntry(ieee, pBA);

        pBA->DialogToken++;
-       pBA->BaParamSet.field.AMSDU_Support = 0;
+       pBA->BaParamSet.field.amsdu_support = 0;
        pBA->BaParamSet.field.ba_policy = Policy;
        pBA->BaParamSet.field.TID =
                         pTS->TsCommonInfo.TSpec.f.TSInfo.field.ucTSID;
--
2.30.0

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to