Em Tue, 27 Apr 2021 14:47:01 +0300
Dmitry Osipenko <dig...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> 27.04.2021 13:26, Mauro Carvalho Chehab пишет:
> > @@ -1088,8 +1090,9 @@ static int tegra_vde_remove(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > {
> > struct tegra_vde *vde = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > - pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
>
> Should be cleaner to return error directly here, IMO.
I double-checked how drivers/base/platform.c deals with non-zero
returns at the .remove method:
static int platform_remove(struct device *_dev)
{
struct platform_driver *drv = to_platform_driver(_dev->driver);
struct platform_device *dev = to_platform_device(_dev);
if (drv->remove) {
int ret = drv->remove(dev);
if (ret)
dev_warn(_dev, "remove callback returned a
non-zero value. This will be ignored.\n");
}
dev_pm_domain_detach(_dev, true);
return 0;
}
Basically, it will print a message but will ignore whatever happens
afterwards.
So, if the driver is changed to return an error there, it will leak
resources.
Thanks,
Mauro
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
