Jerome Pouiller <jerome.pouil...@silabs.com> writes:

> From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouil...@silabs.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouil...@silabs.com>

[...]

> +static int hif_startup_indication(struct wfx_dev *wdev,
> +                               const struct hif_msg *hif, const void *buf)
> +{
> +     const struct hif_ind_startup *body = buf;
> +
> +     if (body->status || body->firmware_type > 4) {
> +             dev_err(wdev->dev, "received invalid startup indication");
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +     memcpy(&wdev->hw_caps, body, sizeof(struct hif_ind_startup));
> +     le16_to_cpus((__le16 *)&wdev->hw_caps.hardware_id);
> +     le16_to_cpus((__le16 *)&wdev->hw_caps.num_inp_ch_bufs);
> +     le16_to_cpus((__le16 *)&wdev->hw_caps.size_inp_ch_buf);
> +     le32_to_cpus((__le32 *)&wdev->hw_caps.supported_rate_mask);

I don't really like the casts here, and not really reliable either if
there's ever more fields. I would just store values as little endian in
hw_caps, I doubt it's performance critical.

And why does struct hif_ind_startup use both u32 and __le32? If it's in
little endian it should always use __le types.

[...]

> +     if (hif_id & 0x80)
> +             dev_err(wdev->dev, "unsupported HIF indication: ID %02x\n",
> +                     hif_id);
> +     else
> +             dev_err(wdev->dev, "unexpected HIF confirmation: ID %02x\n",
> +                     hif_id);

No magic values, please. A proper define for bit 0x80 would be nice.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to