On Wednesday 16 February 2022 10:31:11 Jerome Pouiller wrote:
> From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouil...@silabs.com>
>
> Some may think that SDIO_VENDOR_ID_SILABS / SDIO_DEVICE_ID_SILABS_WF200
> are official SDIO IDs. However, it is not the case, the values used by
> WF200 are not official (BTW, the driver rely on the DT rather than on
> the SDIO IDs to probe the device).
>
> To avoid any confusion, remove the definitions SDIO_*_ID_SILABS* and use
> raw values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouil...@silabs.com>
Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár <p...@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/staging/wfx/bus_sdio.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_sdio.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_sdio.c
> index bc3df85a05b6..312d2d391a24 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_sdio.c
> @@ -257,10 +257,9 @@ static void wfx_sdio_remove(struct sdio_func *func)
> sdio_release_host(func);
> }
>
> -#define SDIO_VENDOR_ID_SILABS 0x0000
> -#define SDIO_DEVICE_ID_SILABS_WF200 0x1000
> static const struct sdio_device_id wfx_sdio_ids[] = {
> - { SDIO_DEVICE(SDIO_VENDOR_ID_SILABS, SDIO_DEVICE_ID_SILABS_WF200) },
> + /* WF200 does not have official VID/PID */
> + { SDIO_DEVICE(0x0000, 0x1000) },
> { },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, wfx_sdio_ids);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
