On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:04:35AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 05:52:33PM +0200, Benedict Boerger wrote: > > Fix a coding style issue found by checkpatch.pl. > > Use ether_addr_copy instead of memcpy. > > > > Done to complete a eudyptula task. > > > > Signed-off-by: Benedict Boerger <benedict.boer...@cs.tu-dortmund.de> > > > > --- > > drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c > > b/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c > > index 48841e7..02807a3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c > > @@ -1790,7 +1790,7 @@ static int slic_mcast_add_list(struct adapter > > *adapter, char *address) > > if (mcaddr == NULL) > > return 1; > > > > - memcpy(mcaddr->address, address, ETH_ALEN); > > + ether_addr_copy(mcaddr->address, address); > > > > mcaddr->next = adapter->mcastaddrs; > > adapter->mcastaddrs = mcaddr; > > Are you sure this is correct? It's not always a one-to-one replacement > from what I have been told.
I hate this checkpatch.pl warning because it just encourages people to add bugs. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
