On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 11:23:51AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> When you compare the old and new versions of hmc5843_read_raw() then it
> appears there is a bug fix or something which hasn't been documentented
> in the changelog.
> 
> > -static int hmc5843_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > -                       struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> > -                       int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> > -{
> > -   struct hmc5843_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > -   int rval;
> > -   int ret;
> > -
> > -   switch (mask) {
> > -   case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> > -           return hmc5843_read_measurement(data, chan->scan_index, val);
> > -   case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> > -           ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, HMC5843_CONFIG_REG_B, &rval);
> > -           if (ret < 0)
> > -                   return ret;
> > -           *val = 0;
> > -           *val2 = data->variant->regval_to_nanoscale[rval >> 
> > HMC5843_RANGE_GAIN_OFFSET];
> > -           return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO;
> > -   case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> > -           ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, HMC5843_CONFIG_REG_A, &rval);
> > -           if (ret < 0)
> > -                   return ret;
> > -           rval &= HMC5843_RATE_MASK;
>                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> HMC5843_RATE_MASK is 0x1c.
> 
> > -           *val = data->variant->regval_to_samp_freq[rval][0];
> > -           *val2 = data->variant->regval_to_samp_freq[rval][1];
> > -           return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> > -   }
> > -   return -EINVAL;
> > -}
> 
> > +static int hmc5843_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > +                       struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> > +                       int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> > +{
> > +   struct hmc5843_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +   int rval;
> > +   int ret;
> > +
> > +   switch (mask) {
> > +   case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> > +           return hmc5843_read_measurement(data, chan->scan_index, val);
> > +   case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> > +           ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, HMC5843_CONFIG_REG_B, &rval);
> > +           if (ret < 0)
> > +                   return ret;
> > +           rval >>= HMC5843_RANGE_GAIN_OFFSET;
> > +           *val = 0;
> > +           *val2 = data->variant->regval_to_nanoscale[rval];
> > +           return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO;
> > +   case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> > +           ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, HMC5843_CONFIG_REG_A, &rval);
> > +           if (ret < 0)
> > +                   return ret;
> > +           rval >>= HMC5843_RATE_OFFSET;
>                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> HMC5843_RATE_OFFSET is 0x02.
> 
> > +           *val = data->variant->regval_to_samp_freq[rval][0];
> > +           *val2 = data->variant->regval_to_samp_freq[rval][1];
> > +           return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> > +   }
> > +   return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> 
> Ideally this patch would be a straight move and no code changes.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter

It seems I forgot to change the first commit when I discovered this
bug. I will resend fixed version within few minutes.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to