From: Rajendra Nayak <rna...@ti.com>
Without the patch:
/debug/.../dpll_core_x2_ck/dpll_core_h12x2_ck # cat clk_rate
532000000
/debug/.../dpll_core_x2_ck/dpll_core_h12x2_ck/l3_iclk_div # cat clk_rate
532000000
/debug/.../dpll_core_x2_ck/dpll_core_h12x2_ck/l3_iclk_div/l4_root_clk_div # cat
clk_rate
532000000
With the patch:
/debug/.../dpll_core_x2_ck/dpll_core_h12x2_ck # cat clk_rate
532000000
/debug/.../dpll_core_x2_ck/dpll_core_h12x2_ck/l3_iclk_div # cat clk_rate
266000000
/debug/.../dpll_core_x2_ck/dpll_core_h12x2_ck/l3_iclk_div/l4_root_clk_div # cat
clk_rate
133000000
The l3 clock derived from core DPLL is actually a divider clock,
with the default divider set to 2. l4 then derived from l3 is a fixed factor
clock, but the fixed divider is 2 and not 1. Which means the l3 clock is
half of core DPLLs h12x2 and l4 is half of l3 (as seen with this patch)
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rna...@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kri...@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: sam-the-6 <asadi.sam...@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7xx-clocks.dtsi | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7xx-clocks.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7xx-clocks.dtsi
index c90c76d..dc7a292 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7xx-clocks.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7xx-clocks.dtsi
@@ -673,10 +673,12 @@
l3_iclk_div: l3_iclk_div {
#clock-cells = <0>;
- compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
+ compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
+ ti,max-div = <2>;
+ ti,bit-shift = <4>;
+ reg = <0x0100>;
clocks = <&dpll_core_h12x2_ck>;
- clock-mult = <1>;
- clock-div = <1>;
+ ti,index-power-of-two;
};
l4_root_clk_div: l4_root_clk_div {
@@ -684,7 +686,7 @@
compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
clocks = <&l3_iclk_div>;
clock-mult = <1>;
- clock-div = <1>;
+ clock-div = <2>;
};
video1_clk2_div: video1_clk2_div {
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
