We should schedule the 5s "timer work" before starting the data transfer,
otherwise, the data transfer code may finish so fast on another
virtual cpu that when the code(fcopy_write()) trying to cancel the 5s
"timer work" can occasionally fail because the "timer work" may haven't
been scheduled yet and as a result the fcopy process will be aborted
wrongly by fcopy_work_func() in 5s.

Thank Liz Zhang <liz...@microsoft.com> for the initial investigation
on the bug.

This addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118123

Tested-by: Liz Zhang <liz...@microsoft.com>
Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiya...@microsoft.com>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <de...@microsoft.com>
---
 drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c b/drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c
index eaaa3d8..23b2ce2 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c
@@ -246,8 +246,8 @@ void hv_fcopy_onchannelcallback(void *context)
                /*
                 * Send the information to the user-level daemon.
                 */
-               fcopy_send_data();
                schedule_delayed_work(&fcopy_work, 5*HZ);
+               fcopy_send_data();
                return;
        }
        icmsghdr->icflags = ICMSGHDRFLAG_TRANSACTION | ICMSGHDRFLAG_RESPONSE;
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to