On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:33:32PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 17 July 2014 11:56:58 Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:20:36AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > [...] > > > score should set HAS_IOMEM and doesn't > > > even have public compilers > > > > This begs an interesting question. Should it be made a requirement to > > have publicly available compilers for new architectures so that they can > > at least be compile-tested? Preferably this would of course be in source > > form so that there aren't any dependencies on the distribution. > > The question has come up a few times. I wouldn't mandate that the port > has an upstream gcc (you've got to start mainlining one of them first > after all), but having compilers available for download should probably be > required. It's hard to ask for a particular quality of that gcc port > though, or to expect it to stay available online. > > Where did you find the gcc port for score?
It's upstream, though marked obsolete and to be removed in the next release... =) Thierry
pgp2_qLMI3Awb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
