On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:51:06AM +0000, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote: > SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (16) should be favored over SYNCHRONIZE > CACHE (10) unless SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (10) is not supported.
I gues you mean (16) for the last occurance? What's the benefit of using SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (16) if we don't pass a LBA range? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
