On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Måns Rullgård <m...@mansr.com> wrote: > Nick Krause <xerofo...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Måns Rullgård <m...@mansr.com> wrote: >>> Nick Krause <xerofo...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Måns Rullgård <m...@mansr.com> wrote: >>>>> Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:47:25 -0400 >>>>>> Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The three parameters are the number of elements, the size of each >>>>>>> individual >>>>>>> element, and then finally the flags used on how to allocate that memory. >>>>>>> I have to say, you did get the flags part correct. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now lets look at what you did. For the size you had: >>>>>> >>>>>> That should have read "For the count you had:" >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh well, you get my point anyway. >>>>> >>>>> I have some doubts about the last bit. >>>> >>>> I am have this discussion with other kernel developers and just >>>> because I send out one patch as a newbie like this doesn't mean I >>>> don't known C. >>> >>> Now I no longer have doubts; I know for certain that the point didn't >>> get across. >> >> I get your point try other things but I talked to other kernel >> developers and most of them seemed to get this feedback to when they >> started. > > Most kernel devs most certainly did NOT get started by spamming lkml > with unnecessary and incorrect patches despite being repeatedly told to > go away and stop wasting everybody's time. > > -- > Måns Rullgård > m...@mansr.com
FIne , I give up. You want me to leave this then I wiil. Nick _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
