On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 05:08:28PM -0500, Eric Rost wrote:
> This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl Warnings:
>
> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (16, 16)
> + for (r = 1; r < 2 * RCNT; r += 2 * SKEIN_UNROLL_512)
> [...]
> + {
>
> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (16, 16)
> + for (r = 1; r <= 2 * RCNT; r += 2 * SKEIN_UNROLL_1024)
> [...]
> + {
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Rost <eric.r...@mybabylon.net>
> ---
> drivers/staging/skein/skein_block.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/skein/skein_block.c
> b/drivers/staging/skein/skein_block.c
> index 616364f..bbb5a5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/skein/skein_block.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/skein/skein_block.c
> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ do { \
>
> for (r = 1; r < 2 * RCNT; r += 2 * SKEIN_UNROLL_512)
> #endif /* end of looped code definitions */
> - {
> + {
I'm glad you are trying to fix things, but in looking at this closer,
does it look correct to you?
> #define R512_8_ROUNDS(R) /* do 8 full rounds */ \
> do { \
> R512(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, R_512_0, 8 * (R) + 1); \
> @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ do { \
> #if (SKEIN_UNROLL_512 > 14)
> #error "need more unrolling in skein_512_process_block"
> #endif
> - }
> + }
same here?
How about working on getting rid of the #if crap in this driver, that
will fix up this { } mess automatically.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
