> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpen...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 9:10 PM
> To: Thomas Shao
> Cc: o...@aepfle.de; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; jasow...@redhat.com;
> linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; a...@canonical.com;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; t...@linutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hyperv: Implement Time Synchronization using host
> time sample
> 
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:50:23PM +0000, Thomas Shao wrote:
> > > > -static inline void do_adj_guesttime(u64 hosttime)
> > > > +static inline void do_adj_guesttime(u64 hosttime, bool forceSync)
> > >
> > > I'm surprise checkpatch.pl does't complain about this CamelCase.
> >
> > I've run the scripts/checkpatch.pl, it didn't complain anything. I'll 
> > change to
> forcesync.
> 
> ->force_sync is normal kernel style.

OK, got it. Thanks Dan!

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to