Em Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:21:40 +0100
Abel Moyo <abelmoyo...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Replaced printk with pr_debug in dprintk
>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Moyo <abelmoyo...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_serial.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_serial.c
> b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_serial.c
> index 181b92b..86c5274 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_serial.c
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static bool txsense; /* 0 = active high, 1 = active
> low */
> #define dprintk(fmt, args...) \
> do { \
> if (debug) \
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG LIRC_DRIVER_NAME ": " \
> + pr_debug(LIRC_DRIVER_NAME ": " \
> fmt, ## args); \
> } while (0)
>
No, this is a bad idea. If dynamic_printk is enabled, in order to
activate the debug messages, it would be required to enable debug
modprobe parameter _and_ to enable each debug msg individually.
We should either use one or the other approach.
Regards,
Mauro
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
