On Sun, 2014-12-14 at 23:52 +0100, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.
> 
> Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.

Perhaps the tool could use a little work.
It's not possible for end to be NULL no?

unsigned long long simple_strtoull(const char *cp, char **endp, unsigned int 
base)
{
        unsigned long long result;
        unsigned int rv;

        cp = _parse_integer_fixup_radix(cp, &base);
        rv = _parse_integer(cp, base, &result);
        /* FIXME */
        cp += (rv & ~KSTRTOX_OVERFLOW);

        if (endp)
                *endp = (char *)cp;

        return result;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_strtoull);


> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c 
> b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
[]

Above this:

        whole = simple_strtoull(pbuf, &end, 10);

> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
> @@ -1897,17 +1897,19 @@ int lprocfs_write_frac_u64_helper(const char *buffer, 
> unsigned long count,
>       }
>  
>       units = 1;
> -     switch (*end) {
> -     case 'p': case 'P':
> -             units <<= 10;
> -     case 't': case 'T':
> -             units <<= 10;
> -     case 'g': case 'G':
> -             units <<= 10;
> -     case 'm': case 'M':
> -             units <<= 10;
> -     case 'k': case 'K':
> -             units <<= 10;
> +     if (end) {
> +             switch (*end) {
> +             case 'p': case 'P':
> +                     units <<= 10;
> +             case 't': case 'T':
> +                     units <<= 10;
> +             case 'g': case 'G':
> +                     units <<= 10;
> +             case 'm': case 'M':
> +                     units <<= 10;
> +             case 'k': case 'K':
> +                     units <<= 10;
> +             }

The only thing I might do is

        switch (tolower(*end)) {

and remove the second case entry for each line

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to