On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:41 AM, devendra.aaru <devendra.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:04 AM, sanjeev sharma
> <sanjeevsharmae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Devendra Naga <devendra.a...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> the function cp_tm1217_mask_interrupt can return failure.
>>> added the check and the failure path.
>>>
>>> Cc: Ramesh Agarwal <ramesh.agar...@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Devendra Naga <devendra.a...@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> build tested only on x86_64. config is allmodconfig.
>>>
>>> drivers/staging/cptm1217/clearpad_tm1217.c | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/cptm1217/clearpad_tm1217.c
>>> b/drivers/staging/cptm1217/clearpad_tm1217.c
>>> index 7f265ce..54e5953 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/cptm1217/clearpad_tm1217.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/cptm1217/clearpad_tm1217.c
>>> @@ -446,6 +446,12 @@ static int cp_tm1217_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>>
>>> /* Mask all the interrupts */
>>> retval = cp_tm1217_mask_interrupt(ts);
>>> + if (retval) {
>>> + dev_err(ts->dev, "failed to mask interrupts, error: %d\n",
>>> + retval);
>>> + kfree(ts);
>>
>> Here you are doing more than what you have specified in change-log.How
>> did you find out memory leak ? Did you used any facility like kmemleak
>> facility to find this
>> problem ?
>
> No i am not doing more than one change. Read the change log one more time.
you are addressing the memory leak which is not mentioned in change-log.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
