As indicated by checkpatch.pl, "WARNING: Use of volatile is usually
wrong: ...", the 'count' member of the private data does not need to
be volatile.
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hswee...@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Ian Abbott <abbo...@mev.co.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_at_a2150.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_at_a2150.c
b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_at_a2150.c
index 69e543a..8265322 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_at_a2150.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_at_a2150.c
@@ -146,8 +146,7 @@ static const struct a2150_board a2150_boards[] = {
};
struct a2150_private {
-
- volatile unsigned int count; /* number of data points left to be
taken */
+ unsigned int count; /* number of data points left to be taken */
unsigned int dma; /* dma channel */
uint16_t *dma_buffer; /* dma buffer */
unsigned int dma_transfer_size; /* size in bytes of dma transfers */
--
2.0.3
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
