On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 01:53:18PM +0000, Sean Cleator wrote:
> A patch to the slicoss.c file to fix some of the long line issues found by the
> checkpath.pl tool
>  
> Signed-off-by: Sean Cleator <seanclea...@hotmail.co.uk>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c | 39 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c 
> b/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c
> index 56ca3b6..4df4a7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c
> @@ -498,12 +498,14 @@ static int slic_card_download(struct adapter *adapter)
>                       slic_reg32_write(&slic_regs->slic_wcs,
>                                        baseaddress + codeaddr, FLUSH);
>                       /* Write out instruction to low addr */
> -                     slic_reg32_write(&slic_regs->slic_wcs, instruction, 
> FLUSH);
> +                     slic_reg32_write(&slic_regs->slic_wcs,
> +                                     instruction, FLUSH);
>                       instruction = *(u32 *)(fw->data + index);
>                       index += 4;
>  
>                       /* Write out instruction to high addr */
> -                     slic_reg32_write(&slic_regs->slic_wcs, instruction, 
> FLUSH);
> +                     slic_reg32_write(&slic_regs->slic_wcs,
> +                                     instruction, FLUSH);
>                       instruction = *(u32 *)(fw->data + index);
>                       index += 4;
>               }
> @@ -1533,14 +1535,18 @@ retry_rcvqfill:
>                               dev_err(dev, "%s: LOW 32bits PHYSICAL ADDRESS 
> == 0\n",
>                                       __func__);
>                               dev_err(dev, "skb[%p] PROBLEM\n", skb);
> -                             dev_err(dev, "         skbdata[%p]\n", 
> skb->data);
> +                             dev_err(dev, "         skbdata[%p]\n",
> +                                             skb->data);
>                               dev_err(dev, "         skblen[%x]\n", skb->len);
>                               dev_err(dev, "         paddr[%p]\n", paddr);
>                               dev_err(dev, "         paddrl[%x]\n", paddrl);
>                               dev_err(dev, "         paddrh[%x]\n", paddrh);
> -                             dev_err(dev, "         rcvq->head[%p]\n", 
> rcvq->head);
> -                             dev_err(dev, "         rcvq->tail[%p]\n", 
> rcvq->tail);
> -                             dev_err(dev, "         rcvq->count[%x]\n", 
> rcvq->count);
> +                             dev_err(dev, "         rcvq->head[%p]\n",
> +                                             rcvq->head);
> +                             dev_err(dev, "         rcvq->tail[%p]\n",
> +                                             rcvq->tail);
> +                             dev_err(dev, "         rcvq->count[%x]\n",
> +                                             rcvq->count);
>                               dev_err(dev, "SKIP THIS SKB!!!!!!!!\n");
>                               goto retry_rcvqfill;
>                       }


This change makes the code look worse, don't you think?  Please don't do
that.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to