On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:10:58AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 19:55 +0100, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
This patch fixes coding style of PCI device table declaration.
[]
diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_driver.c 
b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_driver.c
[]
@@ -98,11 +98,11 @@ static struct timer_list dgnc_poll_timer;


 static struct pci_device_id dgnc_pci_tbl[] = {

const

-       {       DIGI_VID, PCI_DEVICE_CLASSIC_4_DID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 
0,       0 },
-       {       DIGI_VID, PCI_DEVICE_CLASSIC_4_422_DID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 
0, 0,   1 },
-       {       DIGI_VID, PCI_DEVICE_CLASSIC_8_DID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 
0,       2 },
-       {       DIGI_VID, PCI_DEVICE_CLASSIC_8_422_DID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 
0, 0,   3 },
-       {0,}                                            /* 0 terminated list. */
+       {PCI_DEVICE(DIGI_VID, PCI_DEVICE_CLASSIC_4_DID), .driver_data = 0},
+       {PCI_DEVICE(DIGI_VID, PCI_DEVICE_CLASSIC_4_422_DID), .driver_data = 1},
+       {PCI_DEVICE(DIGI_VID, PCI_DEVICE_CLASSIC_8_DID), .driver_data = 2},
+       {PCI_DEVICE(DIGI_VID, PCI_DEVICE_CLASSIC_8_422_DID), .driver_data = 3},
+       {0,}

Maybe better to keep the alignment of .driver_data

+       {PCI_DEVICE(DIGI_VID, PCI_DEVICE_CLASSIC_4_DID),     .driver_data = 0},
+       {PCI_DEVICE(DIGI_VID, PCI_DEVICE_CLASSIC_4_422_DID), .driver_data = 1},
+       {PCI_DEVICE(DIGI_VID, PCI_DEVICE_CLASSIC_8_DID),     .driver_data = 2},
+       {PCI_DEVICE(DIGI_VID, PCI_DEVICE_CLASSIC_8_422_DID), .driver_data = 3},


Good idea, looks better this way, I'll resend.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to