On 01/28/2015 04:46 PM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
Variable ar assigned a value that is never used.

s/ar/rc/

I have also removed all the code that thereby serves no purpose.

This was found using a static code analysis program called cppcheck

Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se>
---
  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fid/lproc_fid.c |    3 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fid/lproc_fid.c 
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fid/lproc_fid.c
index 6a21f07..feb7425 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fid/lproc_fid.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fid/lproc_fid.c
@@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ static int lprocfs_fid_write_common(const char __user 
*buffer, size_t count,
                                    struct lu_seq_range *range)
  {
        struct lu_seq_range tmp;
-       int rc;
        char kernbuf[MAX_FID_RANGE_STRLEN];

        LASSERT(range != NULL);
@@ -82,7 +81,7 @@ static int lprocfs_fid_write_common(const char __user 
*buffer, size_t count,
        }

        /* of the form "[0x0000000240000400 - 0x000000028000400]" */
-       rc = sscanf(kernbuf, "[%llx - %llx]\n",
+       sscanf(kernbuf, "[%llx - %llx]\n",

I would test rc instead:
  if (rc != 2)
       return -EINVAL;

Regards,
  Frank.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to