On 30/01/15 12:10, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:29:44AM +0000, Ian Abbott wrote:
@@ -285,7 +284,7 @@ static irqreturn_t apci3501_interrupt(int irq, void *d)
ul_Command1 = inl(dev->iobase + APCI3501_TIMER_CTRL_REG);
ul_Command1 = ((ul_Command1 & 0xFFFFF9FDul) | 1 << 1);
outl(ul_Command1, dev->iobase + APCI3501_TIMER_CTRL_REG);
- i_temp = inl(dev->iobase + APCI3501_TIMER_STATUS_REG) & 0x1;
+ inl(dev->iobase + APCI3501_TIMER_STATUS_REG);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
Reviewed-by: Ian Abbott <abbo...@mev.co.uk>
Ian, is the inl() really needed? Richard did the conservative thing,
but if we knew we could delete the inl() that would be nice.
I'm not sure if it's really needed, but it is part of some watchdog
functionality, so I thought it best to leave it alone.
Hartley might know if it's needed.
--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbo...@mev.co.uk> )=-
-=( Web: http://www.mev.co.uk/ )=-
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
