hey greg, I've updated to the latest linux-next, applied the patch and compiled 
with no issues.

I think it might be due to clashes with another patch that has been proposed by 
Tal Shorer to fix style violations in linux-proc.c (which my patch merges into 
module.c)

Tal - do you want to take my patch, apply it onto your tree, and then apply the 
style fixes? It shouldn't be too difficult to merge our patches into one series?

On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 05:27:01PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 07:24:40PM +0800, Matt Tyler wrote:
> > module.c was previously the sole exporter of symbols from module.c
> > This patch removes the global symbols by merging the two files.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Tyler <matt.ty...@flashics.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/Makefile      |   2 +-
> >  .../lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-proc.c        | 577 
> > ---------------------
> >  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/module.c      | 546 
> > ++++++++++++++++++-
> >  3 files changed, 540 insertions(+), 585 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-proc.c
> 
> This doesn't apply to my tree :(
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to