Hi Laurent, On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> wrote: >> + for (i = 0; i < dev->ngpios; i++) >> + gpio_request_one(dev->gpios[i].gpio, dev->gpios[i].flags, >> + pdev->name); > > Aren't GPIO numbers dynamic too in DT-based systems ? Beside, shouldn't it be
Apparently not, as the old legacy number still works, and it doesn't work without. > the responsibility of the drievr to request the GPIOs it needs ? As far as I understand it, on Armadillo this is used more for platform configuration than for device configuration, as it affects multiple devices (the comment says DBGMD/LCDC0/FSIA MUX). I guess I could use a "gpio-hog" subnode in DT instead, but then we're already implementing the conversion to DT ;-) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel