On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 15:12 +0000, Simmons, James A. wrote:
> >> typedef struct lnet_peer {
> >> - struct list_head lp_hashlist; /* chain on peer hash */
> >> - struct list_head lp_txq; /* messages blocking for tx
> >> credits */
> >> - struct list_head lp_rtrq; /* messages blocking for
> >> router credits */
> >> - struct list_head lp_rtr_list; /* chain on router list */
> >> - int lp_txcredits; /* # tx credits available */
> >> - int lp_mintxcredits; /* low water mark */
> >> - int lp_rtrcredits; /* # router credits */
> >> - int lp_minrtrcredits; /* low water mark */
> >> - unsigned int lp_alive:1; /* alive/dead? */
> >> - unsigned int lp_notify:1; /* notification outstanding? */
> >> - unsigned int lp_notifylnd:1; /* outstanding notification for
> >> LND? */
> >> - unsigned int lp_notifying:1; /* some thread is handling
> >> notification */
> >> - unsigned int lp_ping_notsent; /* SEND event outstanding from
> >> ping */
> >> - int lp_alive_count; /* # times router went
> >> dead<->alive */
> >> - long lp_txqnob; /* bytes queued for sending */
> >> - unsigned long lp_timestamp; /* time of last aliveness news */
> >> - unsigned long lp_ping_timestamp; /* time of last ping attempt */
> >> - unsigned long lp_ping_deadline; /* != 0 if ping reply expected */
> >> - unsigned long lp_last_alive; /* when I was last alive */
> >> - unsigned long lp_last_query; /* when lp_ni was queried last time */
> >> - lnet_ni_t *lp_ni; /* interface peer is on */
> >> - lnet_nid_t lp_nid; /* peer's NID */
> >> - int lp_refcount; /* # refs */
> >> - int lp_cpt; /* CPT this peer attached on */
> >> + /* chain on peer hash */
> >> + struct list_head lp_hashlist;
> >> + /* messages blocking for tx credits */
> >> + struct list_head lp_txq;
> >> + /* messages blocking for router credits */
> >> + struct list_head lp_rtrq;
> >> + /* chain on router list */
> >> + struct list_head lp_rtr_list;
> >> + /* # tx credits available */
> >> + int lp_txcredits;
> >> + /* low water mark */
> >> + int lp_mintxcredits;
> >> + /* # router credits */
> >> + int lp_rtrcredits;
> >> + /* low water mark */
> >> + int lp_minrtrcredits;
> >> + /* alive/dead? */
> >> + unsigned int lp_alive:1;
> >> + /* notification outstanding? */
> >> + unsigned int lp_notify:1;
> >> + /* outstanding notification for LND? */
> >> + unsigned int lp_notifylnd:1;
> >
> >This new block of declarations is uglier than the original. Don't make
> >things uglier.
>
> Might be ugly but it makes checkpatch.pl happy. So it is a choice between
> making checkpatch.pl happy about staying in the 80 character limit or looking
> nice and chekpatch.pl being unhappy.
I would choose looking nice every time.
checkpatch is stupid. Please don't let it control you.
Maybe it'd be better to add another --ignore type just for
comments that extend longer than the maximum line length to
checkpatch.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
