I'm fine with merging this patch as is.
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 04:43:26PM -0400, James Simmons wrote:
> + struct lnet_peer *msg_txpeer; /* peer I'm sending to */
> + struct lnet_peer *msg_rxpeer; /* peer I received from */
> +
> + void *msg_private;
> + struct lnet_libmd *msg_md;
> +
> + unsigned int msg_len;
> + unsigned int msg_wanted;
> + unsigned int msg_offset;
> + unsigned int msg_niov;
> + struct kvec *msg_iov;
> + lnet_kiov_t *msg_kiov;
> +
> + lnet_event_t msg_ev;
> + lnet_hdr_t msg_hdr;
These aren't in "lustre style". Lustre style is more like:
unsigned int msg_len;
unsigned int msg_wanted;
unsigned int msg_offset;
unsigned int msg_niov;
struct kvec *msg_iov;
lnet_kiov_t *msg_kiov;
We're going through and re-indenting things. I think just one space
between type and name is the right thing for .c files but you guys
really should figure out what style you're using for your header files.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
