On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 04:58:41PM +0530, Sunil Shahu wrote:
> "else" statement after "if" is unnecessary, hence removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Shahu <shsh...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_security.c | 35
> ++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_security.c
> b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_security.c
> index bcd1a51..21465c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_security.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_security.c
> @@ -124,28 +124,25 @@ static u8 crc32_reverseBit(u8 data)
>
> static void crc32_init(void)
> {
> + sint i, j;
> + u32 c = 0x12340000;
^^^^^^^^^^
In another follow on patch you can get rid of this. It is nonsense and
it isn't used.
> + u8 *p = (u8 *)&c, *p1;
> + u8 k;
> +
> if (bcrc32initialized == 1)
> return;
> - else {
> - sint i, j;
> - u32 c;
> - u8 *p = (u8 *)&c, *p1;
> - u8 k;
> -
> - c = 0x12340000;
> - for (i = 0; i < 256; ++i) {
> - k = crc32_reverseBit((u8)i);
> - for (c = ((u32)k) << 24, j = 8; j > 0; --j)
> - c = c & 0x80000000 ? (c << 1) ^ CRC32_POLY :
> - (c << 1);
> - p1 = (u8 *)&crc32_table[i];
> - p1[0] = crc32_reverseBit(p[3]);
> - p1[1] = crc32_reverseBit(p[2]);
> - p1[2] = crc32_reverseBit(p[1]);
> - p1[3] = crc32_reverseBit(p[0]);
> - }
> - bcrc32initialized = 1;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 256; ++i) {
> + k = crc32_reverseBit((u8)i);
> + for (c = ((u32)k) << 24, j = 8; j > 0; --j)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
We always re-initialize c here.
> + c = c & 0x80000000 ? (c << 1) ^ CRC32_POLY : (c << 1);
> + p1 = (u8 *)&crc32_table[i];
> + p1[0] = crc32_reverseBit(p[3]);
> + p1[1] = crc32_reverseBit(p[2]);
> + p1[2] = crc32_reverseBit(p[1]);
> + p1[3] = crc32_reverseBit(p[0]);
> }
> + bcrc32initialized = 1;
> }
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
