On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 09:59 +0200, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> Mario Bambagini <mario.bambag...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Defines have been written in more than one line to match the 80-character
> > rule. This error has been fixed 6 times in this file.
> > The file is fully compliant with respect to the coding rules now.
>
> Rules, maybe. But is it better, i.e., more readable?
>
> > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_debug.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_debug.h
[]
> > -#define LCONSOLE(mask, format, ...) CDEBUG(D_CONSOLE | (mask), format, ##
> > __VA_ARGS__)
[]
> > +#define LCONSOLE(mask, format, ...)
> > \
> > + CDEBUG(D_CONSOLE | (mask), format, ## __VA_ARGS__)
> ... I don't think so. Perhaps if I wasn't using the bleading edge tech
> 132-column digital flat LCD screen, I would see this differently (Emacs
> isn't perfect when displaying long lines on IBM monochrome display
> adapter, even with the intelligent-long-lines-wrap package).
I think this isn't particularly nice because of the
different alignment styles used for the macros.
I think it's OK as is, but it _might_ be nicer if it
removed the space after ## and used the same indent
as most other macros.
#define LCONSOLE(mask, fmt, ...) \
CDEBUG(D_CONSOLE | (mask), fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
and
#define LCONSOLE_ERROR_MSG(errnum, fmt, ...) \
CDEBUG_LIMIT(D_CONSOLE | D_ERROR, "%x-%x: " fmt, \
errnum, LERRCHKSUM(errnum), ##__VA_ARGS__)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
