On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:16:11PM +0200, Christian Gromm wrote:
> This patch fixes a possible overflow in module hdm-dim2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Gromm <christian.gr...@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/most/hdm-dim2/dim2_hdm.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/hdm-dim2/dim2_hdm.c
> b/drivers/staging/most/hdm-dim2/dim2_hdm.c
> index dda02a6..855bcd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/most/hdm-dim2/dim2_hdm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/most/hdm-dim2/dim2_hdm.c
> @@ -381,11 +381,12 @@ static void service_done_flag(struct dim2_hdm *dev, int
> ch_idx)
> if (hdm_ch->data_type == MOST_CH_CONTROL ||
> hdm_ch->data_type == MOST_CH_ASYNC) {
>
> - u16 const data_size =
> - (u16)data[0] * 256 + data[1] + 2;
> + u32 data_size =
> + (u32)data[0] * 256 + data[1] + 2;
>
> mbo->processed_length =
> - min(data_size, mbo->buffer_length);
> + min_t(u32, data_size,
> + mbo->buffer_length);
> } else {
> mbo->processed_length = mbo->buffer_length;
> }
This doesn't apply to my staging-next branch at all, what did you make
it against?
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
