On 02/11/15 14:25, ranjithec...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ranjith <ranjithec...@gmail.com>BIT macro is used for defining bit location instead of shifting operator - coding style issue Signed-off-by: Ranjith T <ranjithec...@gmail.com> --- drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_1032.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_1032.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_1032.c index b37166d..fd5ce21 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_1032.c +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_1032.c @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ #define APCI1032_STATUS_REG 0x0c #define APCI1032_CTRL_REG 0x10 #define APCI1032_CTRL_INT_OR (0 << 1) -#define APCI1032_CTRL_INT_AND (1 << 1) -#define APCI1032_CTRL_INT_ENA (1 << 2) +#define APCI1032_CTRL_INT_AND BIT(1) +#define APCI1032_CTRL_INT_ENA BIT(2) struct apci1032_private { unsigned long amcc_iobase; /* base of AMCC I/O registers */
Hartley already fixed this coding style issue. It's in linux-next. -- -=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbo...@mev.co.uk> )=- -=( Web: http://www.mev.co.uk/ )=- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
