On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 10:11:19AM +0700, Ivan Safonov wrote:
> It makes easier to understand the transition to a simpler function form.
> 

You're really breaking your patches into to small pieces.  This patch
makes no sense on its own and introduces a static checker warning that
n is assigned but never used.

> Signed-off-by: Ivan Safonov <insafo...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/fw.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/fw.c 
> b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/fw.c
> index 23aa6d3..d502606 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/fw.c
> @@ -83,10 +83,11 @@ static void _rtl88e_fw_block_write(struct adapter *adapt,
>  
>  static void _rtl88e_fill_dummy(u8 *pfwbuf, u32 *pfwlen)
>  {
> -     u32 fwlen = *pfwlen;
> +     u32 fwlen = *pfwlen, n;

Put these on separate lines.  Generally, it's one variable per line but
especially in this case where we have an initialization.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to