On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 08:07:05PM -0500, Jubin John wrote:
> From: Ira Weiny <iwe...@gmail.com>
>
> sdma_select_engine_vl only needs to protect itself from an invalid VL.
> Something higher up the stack should be warning the user when they try
> to use an SL which maps to an invalid VL.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dean Luick <dean.lu...@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marcinis...@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kaike Wan <kaike....@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <iwe...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jubin John <jubin.j...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/sdma.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/sdma.c
> b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/sdma.c
> index 2a1da21..998bf43 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/sdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/sdma.c
> @@ -777,8 +777,14 @@ struct sdma_engine *sdma_select_engine_vl(
> struct sdma_map_elem *e;
> struct sdma_engine *rval;
>
> - if (WARN_ON(vl > 8))
> - return NULL;
> + /* NOTE This should only happen if SC->VL changed after the initial
> + * checks on the QP/AH
> + * Default will return engine 0 below
> + */
> + if (unlikely(vl >= num_vls)) {
Can you prove that unlikely() makes a measured difference here? If not,
please remove it. If you can, please provide the proof in the changelog
when you resend it.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
