On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 03:21:49AM -0500, Sanidhya Solanki wrote:
> >From 1dbe78ce98037da5467d817a9db838d678b338ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sanidhya Solanki <jpage.l...@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 03:08:53 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] staging: dgnc: Patch includes the checkpatch fixes
Don't include this stuff.
>
> Patch contains the checkpatch fixes as asked by the TODO.
> TODO file is updated as well.
Fix one type of warning at a time. This will be a series of patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanidhya Solanki <jpage.l...@gmail.com>
> @@ -110,7 +98,16 @@ static ssize_t dgnc_vpd_show(struct device *p, struct
> device_attribute *attr,
> int count = 0;
> int i = 0;
>
> - DGNC_VERIFY_BOARD(p, bd);
> + do {
> + if (!p)
> + return 0;
> +
> + bd = dev_get_drvdata(p);
> + if (!bd || bd->magic != DGNC_BOARD_MAGIC)
> + return 0;
> + if (bd->state != BOARD_READY)
> + return 0;
> + } while (0);
Google about why do while(0) loops are used in macros and then redo
this. Mostly the patch isn't bad, but I suspect I'm going to complain
about how you split up some of the long lines.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
