On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 17:41 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 06:27:56AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 14:52 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
> > > Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 09:30:47 +0100
> > >
> > > Six goto statements referred to a source code position directly behind
> > > them.
> > > Thus omit such unnecessary jumps.
> >
> > I suggest you leave a blank line instead
> > of deleting the goto.
> >
>
> What is the point of the little bunny hop?
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
-ENOPARSE little bunny hop
(though I could have said "just leave a blank line)
I think that code blocks are more obvious to read.
This is the original code:
result = foo();
if (result)
goto label;
result = bar();
if (result)
goto label;
result = baz();
if (result)
goto label;
label:
go on...
He proposes:
result = foo();
if (result)
goto label;
result = bar();
if (result)
goto label;
result = baz();
label:
go on...
I don't find the test->goto label; label: use offensive,
but if he does, I think keeping a blank line in place of
the test->goto might be better.
result = foo();
if (result)
goto label;
result = bar();
if (result)
goto label;
result = baz();
label:
go on...
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
